Five fishermen who survived 55 days adrift by drinking rain and parboiling passing fish arrive in GalapagosNew Foto - Five fishermen who survived 55 days adrift by drinking rain and parboiling passing fish arrive in Galapagos

Five fishermen who spent 55 days adrift at sea arrived Saturday at a port in the Galapagos Islands after being rescued by a tuna boat, the Ecuadorian navy said on X. The three Peruvians and two Colombians had been missing since mid-March and were found on May 7 by an Ecuadorian boat called Aldo. The fishermen had reported damage to the boat's alternator two days after setting sail from Pucusana Bay, to the south of Peru's capital Lima, the navy said in a separate post on Friday. The failure caused communication and navigation tools to malfunction, Ecuadorian navy Frigate Capt. Maria Fares told The Associated Press, adding that they had no power on the boat. "They had no starter, lights and everything that a battery generates," she said. To survive, they had to "take rusted water out of the engine (and) when a fish passed by, they caught it and parboiled it to eat." Fares added that they also drank rain and sea water to survive. The men are in stable condition and the navy said it is coordinating with local and foreign authorities to ensure their safe return to their respective countries. Earlier this year, another Peruvian fisherman, 61-year-old Máximo Napa,spent 95 daysat sea alone. He was also rescued by an Ecuadorian vessel and returned to Lima in mid-March to be reunited with his family. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Five fishermen who survived 55 days adrift by drinking rain and parboiling passing fish arrive in Galapagos

Five fishermen who survived 55 days adrift by drinking rain and parboiling passing fish arrive in Galapagos Five fishermen who spent 55 days...
India and Pakistan accuse each other of violating ceasefire hours after reaching dealNew Foto - India and Pakistan accuse each other of violating ceasefire hours after reaching deal

ISLAMABAD (AP) — India and Pakistan agreed to a ceasefire Saturday after U.S.-led talks to endthe most serious military confrontationbetween thenuclear-armed rivalsin decades but accused each other of violating the deal just hours later. The ceasefirehad been expected to bring a swift end to weeks ofescalating clashes, includingmissile and drone strikes, triggered bythe mass shooting of touristslast month that India blames on Pakistan, which denies the charge. But multiple explosions were heard in two large cities of Indian-controlled Kashmir hours after the countries agreed to the deal. Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said late Saturday that "there had been repeated violations of the understanding arrived between the two countries" and accused Pakistan of breaching the agreement. "We call upon Pakistan to take appropriate steps to address these violations and deal with the situation with seriousness and responsibility," he said at a news conference in New Delhi. Misri said the Indian army was "retaliating" for what he called a "border intrusion." In Islamabad, Pakistan's Foreign Ministry blamed Indian forces for initiating the ceasefire violation. The ministry said Pakistan remains committed to the agreement and its forces were handling the situation with responsibility and restraint. "We believe that any issues in the smooth implementation of the ceasefire should be addressed through communication at appropriate levels," the ministry said. The first word of the trucecame from U.S. President Donald Trump, who posted on his Truth Social platform that India and Pakistan had agreed to a full and immediate ceasefire: "Congratulations to both Countries on using Common Sense and Great Intelligence. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said in a speech Saturday that his country agreed to the ceasefire in the larger interest of peace in the region and hoped all the outstanding issues with India, including thelong-running disputeover the Kashmir region, would be resolved through peaceful dialogue. Misri said the head of military operations from both countries spoke Saturday afternoon and agreed "that both sides would stop all firing and military action on land, and in the air and sea." However, hours after the agreement, explosions heard by residents in Srinagar and Jammu in Indian-controlled Kashmir were followed by blackouts in the two cities. There were no immediate reports of casualties. Omar Abdullah, the region's top elected official, said in a post on social media: "What the hell just happened to the ceasefire? Explosions heard across Srinagar!!!" Working toward a broader agreement Conflict between India and Pakistan is not rare, with the two countries having periodically engaged in wars, clashes and skirmishessince gaining independencefrom British India in 1947. The ceasefire in the latest hostilities came after the countries fired volleys of cross-border missile strikes Saturday, when India said it targeted Pakistani air bases after Islamabad fired several high-speed missiles at military and civilian infrastructure in Punjab state. Pakistan said it responded with retaliatory strikes. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said he and Vice President JD Vance had engaged with senior officials from both countries over the past 48 hours. They included Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Sharif, India's External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar and the Pakistani Chief of Army Staff Asim Munir. Rubio said the two governments agreed to "start talks on a broad set of issues at a neutral site." Though Pakistanis had initially celebrated their army's retaliation, they were later jubilant about the truce, saying it was a moment of national pride and relief after days of tension. In Islamabad, Zubaida Bibi expressed her joy atthe restoration of peace with India. "War brings nothing but suffering," she said. "We are happy that calm is returning. It feels like Eid to me. We have won." Trading strikes before the ceasefire Tensions have soared sincethe attack at a popular tourist sitein Indian-controlled Kashmir left 26 civilians dead, mostly Indian Hindu tourists, on April 22. Before the ceasefire was reached, India's military said Pakistan had targeted health facilities and schools at its three air bases in Kashmir early Saturday and India had launched missile strikes in response. They targeted Nur Khan air base in the garrison city of Rawalpindi, near the capital Islamabad, Murid air base in Chakwal city and Rafiqui air base in the Jhang district of eastern Punjab province, according to Pakistan's military spokesman. Pakistan's military said it launched retaliatory strikes against a Indian missile storage facility and air bases in the cities of Pathankot and Udhampur. The Associated Press could not independently verify all the actions attributed to Pakistan or India. After the announcement of Pakistani retaliation,residents in Indian-controlled Kashmirsaid they heard loud explosions at multiple places, including Srinagar, Jammu and Udhampur. "Explosions that we are hearing today are different from the ones we heard the last two nights during drone attacks," said Shesh Paul Vaid, the region's former top police official and Jammu resident. "It looks like a war here." Residents living near Srinagar's airport, which is also an air base, said they were rattled by the explosions and booming sound of jets. "I was already awake, but the explosions jolted my kids out of their sleep. They started crying," said Srinagar resident Mohammed Yasin. Omar Abdullah, Indian-controlled Kashmir's top elected official, welcomed the ceasefire. But he said had it happened two or three days earlier "we might have avoided the bloodshed and the loss of precious lives." ____ Hussain reported from Srinagar, India, and Roy reported from New Delhi. Associated Press writers Sheikh Saaliq in New Delhi, Babar Dogar in Lahore, Pakistan, Asim Tanveer in Multan, Pakistan, Munir Ahmed in Islamabad and Riaz Khan in Peshawar, Pakistan, contributed to this report.

India and Pakistan accuse each other of violating ceasefire hours after reaching deal

India and Pakistan accuse each other of violating ceasefire hours after reaching deal ISLAMABAD (AP) — India and Pakistan agreed to a ceasef...
Proposed SNAP changes could impact 11 million Americans, report findsNew Foto - Proposed SNAP changes could impact 11 million Americans, report finds

A new report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities indicates that a proposed change to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program would risk the benefits of 11 million Americans receiving assistance. The report examined a recent billproposed by Republican Reps. Dusty Johnson, Randy Feenstra, and Warren Davidson. One notable aspect of the legislation is that it would increase the age for complying with SNAP's work requirements from 55 to 65. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities,this proposed change would eliminate benefits for 1.4 million American adults. Another 300,000 people living in households with adults aged 55-64 would be at risk of losing benefits. The proposal would also modify SNAP's work requirement exemptions for parents. Currently, adults with a dependent child under age 18 are exempt from SNAP's work requirements. The bill would change the age limit from 18 to 7. RELATED STORY |USDA urges states to reinforce work requirements for SNAP recipients This proposed change would eliminate benefits for 3.1 million American adults ages 18 to 64 if signed into law. An additional 4.5 million Americans would be at risk of losing benefits because of the proposed change, 4 million of whom are children. If enacted, 500,000 seniors age 65 and older could lose benefits. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities stated that the changes could affect roughly one in four SNAP participants. "With the risk of a recession rising and the Trump administration's tariff policies likely to increase the cost of groceries and other essentials, SNAP's role in supporting people who are temporarily out of work or don't earn enough to afford basic needs is especially critical," the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities wrote. "Taking food away from more people who don't meet a harsh, red tape-laden work requirement or are unable to prove they qualify for an exemption would worsen food insecurity and hardship while undermining SNAP's vital role as an economic stimulus." A similar proposal in 2023 estimated that such changes would save the federal government between $90 billion and $120 billion over the course of a decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Most individuals and families are already subject to some form of work requirements to be eligible for SNAP. "Work is a powerful pathway out of poverty," said Johnson. "Time and time again, work requirements for able-bodied adults have proven to be effective. My bill makes improvements, including closing loopholes some states use to game the system." As of 2023, 42.1 million people, or 12.6% of U.S. residents, were receiving monthly SNAP benefits. RELATED STORY |Kennedy Jr. advocates for a ban on soda purchases with food stamps

Proposed SNAP changes could impact 11 million Americans, report finds

Proposed SNAP changes could impact 11 million Americans, report finds A new report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities indicates...
Tim McGraw's Daughter Audrey Teases Mysterious New Venture With Cryptic UpdateNew Foto - Tim McGraw's Daughter Audrey Teases Mysterious New Venture With Cryptic Update

Soon afterTim McGrawandFaith Hill's youngest daughterAudreyannounced anupcoming performancein Los Angeles, Calif., the singer intrigued fans with mysterious new social media posts that appeared to tease an upcoming project. On May 10, Audrey posted two updates hinting at a personal project, with the first showing a piece of paper with writing on it, the top readable and the bottom blurred out. The message read, "LA's fine and the sun shines most the time, and the feeling is laid back. Palm trees grow and the rents are low, but you know I keep thinking about makin' my way back..." 🎬SIGN UP for Parade's Daily newsletter to get the latest pop culture news & celebrity interviews delivered right to your inbox🎬 "Well I'm Nashville, born and raised, but now I'm lost between this choice. LA's fine, but it ain't home. Nashville's home, but it ain't mine no more..." the text went on. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Audrey (@audreymcgraw) Only hours after posting this, Audrey also shared a black and white photo of what appeared to be Los Angeles, with the caption calling back to the previous update, saying, "LA's fine, but it ain't home." View this post on Instagram A post shared by Audrey (@audreymcgraw) Audrey shared no other information about what the mysterious updates meant, but the writing in the first post could be lyrics to her upcoming music. Only a couple of weeks ago, Audreywrote alongside a photo of herself, "Been writin', been in the studio. Been sangin', playin'…. Lovin', losin', dyin', livin'….Cryin'…. Laughin'…… What're some more 'in's'? Does it even work like that? Anyways, been makin' some things I hope you'll like." Fans of the up-and-coming singer have been anxiously waiting for her to release her own music and follow in her parents' footsteps. Luckily, it seems like that day might be coming sooner rather than later. Related: Tim McGraw's Daughter Audrey's New Singing Video Leaves Fans Begging Her to Release Music

Tim McGraw’s Daughter Audrey Teases Mysterious New Venture With Cryptic Update

Tim McGraw's Daughter Audrey Teases Mysterious New Venture With Cryptic Update Soon afterTim McGrawandFaith Hill's youngest daughter...
An Etiquette Expert Is Begging You to Never, Ever Show Up to a Party at This TimeNew Foto - An Etiquette Expert Is Begging You to Never, Ever Show Up to a Party at This Time

We've all heard the term "fashionably late" when it comes to social functions. No one wants to arrive at a gathering too early and hover anxiously around the host, or interrupt them as they put the final touches on the decor. But when it comes to arriving late to a party, it can be difficult to discern what an acceptable arrival time is. Should you follow the start time listed on your invitation as closely as possible, or hold off until more people have arrived?Although every party host's expectations are bound to be different, etiquette expertLisa Mirza GrottsofGolden Rules Galwarns that it's often better to be safe than sorry when it comes to planning your arrival time. As she puts it, being too "fashionably late" isn't an indicator of your busy social life. Instead, it's often plain disruptive."Arriving late to a party isn't a grand entrance," Grotts says. "It's a gamble, impolite and poor timing."Still, you might find yourself wondering what a good rule of thumb is for event timing. At what point should you notify the host that you'll be late? If you insist on being fashionably late, exactly how late can you be without being rude? And what's the ideal arrival time to aim for in the first place?Below, an etiquette expert answers all the questions you might have about party arrival timing.Related:An Etiquette Expert Is Begging People To Think Twice About This Common Social Habit As a rule of thumb, it's better to arrive early and wait for the party's official start time than to show up long after your fellow guests have already made themselves comfortable. That being said, it's best to avoid showing up before the host has said the party will start unless you've been specifically invited to do so."A good guest honors the host's rhythm, not their own watch," Grotts says. "If you must, drive around the block until the set time." If you're aiming to be on your best behavior, being as punctual as possible is key."There's a fine line between fashionably late and rudely disruptive," Grotts notes. "Respect the invitation as much as you'd want your own time to be respected."Related:7 Things You Should Hide Before Guests Come Over, According to Home-Staging Experts Your "fashionably late" window depends on the exact event you're going to. For instance,Evite professionalsnote that guests at gatherings like dinner parties should arrive within 15 minutes of the stated start time, while the arrival time for larger parties or New Year's gatherings is more flexible. However, when in doubt, Grotts recommends showing up slightly earlier than you think just to be safe."Remember it this way: Behave a little better than what is asked of you," she says. "To be fashionably late should be stylishly timed, not selfishly timed." Grotts recommends letting your host know if you'll be more than 30 minutes late to the party, since "anything beyond that is inconsiderate."When in doubt, she says, "reply early, arrive graciously.""One of my favorite memes [is]: An invite is a gift," Grotts adds ."Responding on time is how you unwrap it!" Up Next: Related: How Late Is Too Late To Cancel Plans? What Etiquette Experts Wish Everyone Knew Lisa Mirza Grotts, ofGolden Rules Gal

An Etiquette Expert Is Begging You to Never, Ever Show Up to a Party at This Time

An Etiquette Expert Is Begging You to Never, Ever Show Up to a Party at This Time We've all heard the term "fashionably late" ...

 

VS MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com